The Buck Stops Here

Joel Bassuk's posterous

  • Top Twitter Tips

    • 16 Apr 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    1. Tweet useful content and links.

    • Always keep your audience in mind.
    • A tweet without a link is like a day without chocolate: edible but a little less tasty.

    2. Engage your audience

    • Direct message people who retweet you, to say thanks
    • Respond to questions/comments directed @you
    • Participate in the Twitter community, for example: #FF, #charitytuesday, #musicmonday

    3. Don't tweet too much. Or too little.

    • Tweet as often as is sufficient and necessary.
    • Naturally this will change depending on what is happening externally (eg, a Haiti earthquake; you’re in the G8 Bloggers Tent, etc).
    • Your twitter feed needs to be fed, but don't you don’t want to spam your audience. Overall, just be mindful of your audience.

    4. Use #hash-tags.

    • Hash tags allow your content to get found, and to appear in searches. Use them!
    • Agree with your friends, colleagues, partners, allies to use the same hash tag.
    • If you get enough people using your tag, it can appear in the 'trending topics' on everyone's Twitter page. That’s cool.

    5. Who you follow reflects who you are.

    • Some people like to follow lots of people.
    • Others find they want to follow key people in their field – as this tends to give you a better, more reliable source of good content to retweet (RT).
    • So it’s up to you, what your Twitter Strategy is. Either way, remember that all the updates from the Tweeters you follow will appear on your 'home' page.

    6. Promote your twitter account.

    • Add prominent links to it on your home page, and in your site's footer.
    • Add it to your email signature. Easy.
    • Get others to promote it. This can take more effort :)

    7. Track your links.

    • Link your account to a popular link-shortener (eg, http://bit.ly, http://ow.ly).

    8. Use a Twitter 'dashboard.

    Helps you to keep an eye on the Twittersphere. Now in full release, TweetDeck is a good tool (though I liked the beta better). HootSuite is another good one (though now they're charging for multiple seats). Your dashboard should help you see: 

    • what people are saying about you
    • what the people you are following are saying (in case you want 2 RT 1 of their tweets)
    • who is retweeting your tweets.

    You can also use Twitter itself for this -- in its @ Connect section -- but this tends to be a bit more time consuming.

    9. Allow for retweets.
    Keep enough characters free at the end so if someone RTs your tweet, they don't have to edit it.

    For example:

    Haiti: A Once in a Century Chance for Change. Beyond reconstruction: re-envisioning Haiti w/equity, oppty http://bit.ly/bSNVRe
    when retweeted, becomes:
    RT @Oxfam Haiti: A Once in a Century Chance for Change. Beyond reconstruction: re-envisioning Haiti w/equity, oppty http://bit.ly/bSNVRe
    thereby using an additional 10 characters.

    10. Be kind.
    • Respond to questions (you may not be able to respond to everyone if you manage a large account).
    • Retweet good content.
    • Participate in #FollowFriday (#FF).

    Twitter resources

    As with many things social media related, Mashable is a great Twitter resource.

    If you're new to Twitter, a good place to start is here:

    • http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/twitter-tutorials-youtube/

    More really useful Twitter tips here:

    • http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/26-twitter-strategy... (great post)
    • http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/05/08/5-tips-to-grow-your-twitter-presence/
       
    • http://mashable.com/2009/04/16/retweet-guide/
    • http://mashable.com/2009/06/25/twitter-seo-tips/

    If you're an old hat at Twitter, dive deeper:

    • http://mashable.com/2010/01/12/zen-social-media/

    And if you have the time for more analysis:

    • http://twitalyzer.com


    What's your favorite Twitter tool?

    • Tweet
  • The London Conference on Somalia or, Alice in Wonderland goes Imperialist

    • 29 Feb 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Surrealism was alive and well at last week’s London Conference on Somalia. Reading Annex B of its final recommendations, which listed ‘Principles for Support to the Somali Security and Justice Sectors’, meant going through the looking glass and entering an Unreal Kingdom of Limitless Virtue hosting some dubious tricks by the Queen of Hearts. The first principle was ‘to be Somali and citizen-owned’. An excellent principle indeed, but strangely adhered to by the conference’s organisers who had limited the Somali delegations to three members, coddled their favourites, dismissed the others, written the conclusions before the Conference had been held and prepared the speech the Transitional Federal Government’s Prime Minister was supposed to deliver (he tried half-heartedly to disobey but British Ambassador Matt Baugh left him with little option)....

    Great read, at the original post by Gerard Prunier http://www.hurstblog.co.uk/the-london-conference-on-somalia-or-alice-in-wonde...

    • Tweet
  • Humanitarian Aid and Security in Somalia: Separate, But Still Unequal? – By Melanie Teff, Refugees International

    • 23 Feb 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    On Thursday, an impressive group of world leaders lead by Prime Minister David Cameron gathered at Lancaster House to discuss Somalia. But like many international conferences before it, the outcome was known well in advance of the first plenary. Indeed, in the weeks leading up to the conference, “leaked” copies of a draft communiqué had been floating around the Internet.

    What we knew from this draft – and what has been confirmed in the final communiqué and statements of many participants – is that the conference’s overwhelming focus was the security situation in Somalia. That meant terrorism and militancy (in the form of Al Shabab), the roles of the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) and African Union peacekeepers, and piracy.

    One would think that a focus of the London Somalia Conference would have been humanitarian concerns, given the severity of the humanitarian crisis. Even now, with famine in the Horn officially declared over, millions of Somalis are experiencing acute shortages of food, shelter, and health care. And since Somalis have spent the last year fleeing drought and militias rather than sowing seeds and raising cattle, the food security situation is precarious.

    Read the rest of Melanie's great post here: http://africanarguments.org/2012/02/23/humanitarian-aid-and-security-in-somal...

    • Tweet
  • Social Law: Social Media Regulation and Policy

    • 23 Feb 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    By Guy Clapperton on January 19, 2012

    The days of anything goes within the social media space are gone. Regulation and legislation now have a profound influence on your company’s social media policy.

    In the 1990s and early part of this century a few things happened: First the Internet arrived. It feels a long time ago but it’s a very recent thing. Then almost immediately people started making wrong assumptions: that if for instance a photograph appeared on the Internet, it was free to use on any other website. Even professional newspapers were guilty of this and found themselves in court for copyright and intellectual property infringement.

    To an extent this still goes on but most participants have adjusted to the central truth: this is the Internet rather than the Wild West and you can’t simply help yourself. Until, that is, you end up in social media in which case a number of liberties are still taken – until a corporate takes some control.
    Take the company making satellite navigation systems whose research and development personnel were tweeting about future product developments and how great the next generation of products were going to be – very much before the company was ready to release them. This needed some sort of policy statement to mitigate trade secrets being lost.

    There are other less well-intentioned examples, and even as this article was being written a high profile case in which an employee complained about being fired because he was actively looking for further employment through LinkedIn went against him. The employer argued, successfully, that he was criticizing the company in public.

    Rest of article at: http://usefulsocialmedia.com/blog/analysis/social-law-social-media-regulation...

    • Tweet
  • Ending world hunger is possible – so why hasn't it been done?

    • 16 Feb 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Ending hunger is entirely feasible (indeed, once achieved, the only question will be why it took us so long). It requires action at several different levels. At a national level, progressive governments in Brazil and Ghana have shown how to cut hunger sharply, through cash transfers to poor people, raising the minimum wage and investing in smallholder farmers (especially women), who both produce food, and are some of the poorest and hungriest people in the Alice in Wonderland world of a brutally unfair farming system....

    www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/15/ending-world-hunger

    • Tweet
  • Twitter's growing pains

    • 1 Feb 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Moves to allow country specific censorship created controversy as netizens voiced concerns - on Twitter.

     

    San Francisco, CA - Last week, Twitter announced changes to the way it handles content takedowns, and it was as if the internet had gone mad. Suddenly, netizens were calling for a Twitter boycott - to take place January 28 - and proclaiming the death of the platform... on Twitter, of course.

    While a Twitter boycott is unlikely to have any real effect - after all, Twitter is still working on a sustainable business model - and yelling about the death of Twitter on Twitter is just, well, humorous, users had a point: What the company had announced was that they'd built in the capability to censor content per country. And to do so only in response to official requests, though you wouldn't know that was the case from the hysterics. 

    On Forbes, Mark Gibbs announced that Twitter had "committed social suicide" before launching into a (now redacted) explanation of how the company was going to institute keyword filtering. Breathless reporters rang up organisations such as mine, asking how this would affect protesters in Egypt. And on Twitter, the shouting continued.

    The truth is, Twitter has indeed instituted a method whereby they can - upon receipt of a "valid and applicable legal request" - take down tweets. The company also states that they will only respond "reactively"; in other words, to content that has already been posted. There is a safety feature built in: Users can change their location if they think the one Twitter has listed based on their IP address is wrong. ReadWriteWeb has suggested the feature might constitute an intentional workaround on Twitter's part.

    As I wrote on my own blog, this is censorship, but Twitter isn't above the law. When the company enters a new jurisdiction, setting up offices and putting employees on the payroll, it is bound by the laws of that jurisdiction. And while Twitter is unlikely to set up shop in China anytime soon, when it comes to free speech, few nations match the legal framework of the United States Constitution's First Amendment (however under threat at the moment it might be). So if Twitter opens an office in Germany - as reports have suggested it might - it is beholden to German law.

    It seems unlikely, however, that Twitter would respond to most requests from outside those jurisdictions where it is required. Unlikely, but not impossible; that's precisely why Twitter has submitted all withheld content to Chilling Effects, a searchable database of Cease and Desist notices sent to internet companies.

    Twitter's page on Chilling Effects already has 4,411 notices, all copyright takedowns under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). In the current climate, it is certainly likely that many of Twitter's future requests will be related to copyright as well.

    In fact, Chilling Effects doesn't show any international requests with which Twitter has complied. While that certainly doesn't mean that Twitter hasn't received any, it does mean that Twitter isn't complying with them... assuming Twitter itself is truly being transparent, that is.

    Therefore, there's little to suggest that the new system is being put in place for any reason other than the prediction that one day, Twitter will be ordered to take something down. And when that happens, they will do so transparently.

    Transparency is key

    Indeed, transparency is the most important element of Twitter's new policy. The company has earned the trust of users by being open and upfront about their policies. So has Google, which famously explained, almost apologetically, its decision to enter China in 2006 on the company blog. 

    There are also plenty of companies that have done next to nothing to gain consumers' trust, from Netsweeper - the company that sells its censorship wares to both Middle Eastern countries and US libraries alike, and categorises several legitimate religious practices as "occult" - to Cisco, complicit in building China's Great Firewall.

    That trust is not instinctual, but based on a company's track record, human rights and corporate social responsibility practices, and (most importantly, when dealing with censorship) transparency. Cisco is as opaque about its practices as Google and Twitter are transparent.

    Rebecca MacKinnon, in her new book Consent of the Networked, writes of the "sovereigns of cyberspace", the CEOs and corporate leaders running the companies that have become integral to our daily lives. The lesson? We, the users, need to start thinking about how the internet is governed and controlled.

    Ultimately, any company is capable of mistakes. But as Twitter moves forward, we must remain vigilant and hold the company accountable to its promises, to ensure it doesn't head down the slippery slope of censorship. Or as Zeynep Tufekci so aptly tweeted: "We need to keep an eye on @twitter so they keep their policy of transparency, & fights [sic] governments [that] try to restrict speech."

    Jillian C York is director for International Freedom of Expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. She also writes for and is on the Board of Directors of Global Voices Online.

    Follow her on Twitter: @jilliancyork

    Original post at: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/01/201213091936736195.html

     

    • Tweet
  • UN launches record $1.5bn appeal to combat Somalia crisis | Global development | guardian.co.uk

    • 14 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • East Africa UN United Nations famine food crisis guardian humanitarian aid somalia
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    The UN will need $1.5bn next year for life-saving projects in Somalia, and has warned any delay in raising funds could be disastrous for those left destitute by the world's largest humanitarian crisis.

    The $1.5bn consolidated appeal process (CAP), or joint appeal, was launched in Nairobi on Tuesday and will fund 350 projects in Somalia, where famine and conflict have already cost tens of thousands of lives. More than half the deaths have been among children.

    The 2012 appeal is 50% higher than in 2011, but officials said this reflected a realistic assessment of needs.

    Somalia has experienced two decades of conflict. Despite a major humanitarian effort this year, 4 million Somalis, 43% of the population, still lack basic necessities, and 3 million of these are in the al-Shabaab controlled south, where 250,000 people are still affected by famine. Al-Shabaab has banned some aid agencies from operating in areas it controls.

    "With the humanitarian situation expected to remain critical well into next year, early and full funding for the CAP 2012 is essential," said Mark Bowden, UN humanitarian co-ordinator for Somalia. "This life-saving plan will only be achieved if donors pledge and commit early."

    In the first half of 2011, humanitarian aid to Somalia was not sufficient to meet the country's needs. But after the first formal declaration of famine, on 20 July, funding rose to $572m in just two months. Although this enabled relief agencies to save many lives, humanitarian officials said more could have been done had the money been available earlier.

    After relief efforts intensified, the number of people receiving food each month more than trebled, to 2.6 million, and more than 480,000 acutely malnourished children received nutritional supplements. Three of the six areas where famine was declared had improved to pre-famine levels by November.

    Kiki Gbeho, head of the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha), said the unprecedented size of the 2012 CAP reflected the unprecedented scale of the emergency. The 2011 CAP was $1bn, with 80% of the funding met.

    "For 2012, the question is how do we ensure that we maintain the funding flows, how do we ensure that all the partners … stay the course, because we expect the situation to remain dire," said Gbeho.

    Bowden was optimistic donors would respond to the new appeal, despite concerns that UN agencies might not be able to reach the most vulnerable people, particularly in the rebel-controlled south.

    "Somalia has become synonymous with the largest crisis facing Africa," he said. "It is at the epicentre of the regional crisis and I think donors understand that unless you address Somalia there will be continuing major problems in Kenya and also in Ethiopia."

    The top state donors for last year's CAP were the US, Britain and Saudi Arabia. One of the main external contributors was the Organisation of Islamic Co-operation (OIC), which provided 16% of non-CAP funds.

    In December, the OIC said the Somali crisis had triggered unprecedented aid funding from many OIC member states and an unmatched public mobilisation of resources to provide assistance.

    There has been some concern that the emergence of new donors and new non-governmental organisations operating in Somalia could complicate relief activities on the ground.

    Bowden said more co-ordination was taking place and that donors too needed to establish partnerships among themselves to deal with burden-sharing.

    The OIC has signed a memorandum of understanding to better co-ordinate activities with Ocha.

    The UN said access remained the biggest challenge in Somalia, adding that organisations taking part in the CAP in 2012 would continue to engage with newer partners, many of whom have increased their activities in the south.

    Bruno Geddo, the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) representative for Somalia, said the 2012 CAP would constitute a "calculated bet" that relief organisations would continue to be able to operate in Somalia despite the al-Shabaab ban and other obstacles to access.

    Around 1.4 million Somalis have been displaced within their own country, and more than 900,000 are living as refugees in neighbouring countries such as Kenya and Ethiopia.

    Senait Gebregziabher, Oxfam country director for Somalia, anticipated the crisis would last well into 2012. "What is crucial right now is to get enough funding to help people cope with the situation before the next harvest in the spring," she said.

    Although donors and the public had committed $1.32bn to Somalia in 2011, this was little more than half the $2.41bn spent by the international community to combat piracy off the coast of Somalia, she noted.

    "We know that donors have deep pockets when it comes to their economic interests," said Gebregziabher. "They must now show the same concern and focus for the fate of tens of thousands of Somalis."

    • This article was amended on 14 December 2011. The original headline said the UN had launched a £1.5bn appeal. This has now been changed.

    via guardian.co.uk

    • Tweet
  • Courage In South Africa

    • 13 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • 350.org COP17 Durban Occupy activism campaigning climate change
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    While the latest round of UN climate negotiations failed to demonstrate the kind of ambition and urgency we need to take on the climate crisis, youth and civil society showed an incredible amount of courage. We saw more kinds of risky, creative, powerful activism than we've seen at any prior UN summit. We're pretty sure that's worth celebrating, not forgetting.

    On a real gut level, Durban's disappointment reminded us of an important lesson. If we're going to win on the UN stage, we've got to win over our home countries first. And to do that, we've got to bring more of this kind of courage back to all the places we call home. 

    So, please spread the word on Facebook & Twitter—and let's make this courage contagious.

    Dec 2nd – A few days into the talks, 350.org partnered with Occupy COP17 to organize a "Rally for Survival."  We provided a megaphone to delegates from the Small Island Nations who are fighting inside the negotiating halls of the UN for their very survival. Ambassador Jumeau of the Seychelles gave new urgency to the protestors when he led a human mic check,

    "During COP 17, You are all small Islanders. So don't save us, save yourselves. We are one and the same." 


    Photo by Julian Koschorke

    Dec 3rd – At the halfway point of the talks, thousands of South Africans joined by global youth, flooded the streets to call for climate justice. 350's banner could be seen far and and wide, as could signs like "Stop Climate Polluters" and "We are the 99%."


    Photo by CYD-DJC

    Dec 7th – A band of Canadian youth delegates turned their their back on the Environment Minister Peter Kent, a puppet for Big Oil, as he took the UN stage. As a result, they were some of the first youth evicted from the talks. Here's how James Hutt, one of the Canadian youth delegates, explained why they took action:

    “Our so-called Environment Minister entered these talks by going on record that he would be defending the tar sands. I have yet to hear him say that he’s here to defend my future."


    Photo by Shadia Fayne Wood

    Dec 8th – US college student Abigail Borah interrupted the lead US negotiator Todd Stern, and for a few moments didn't let him drag down the ambition of the talks. Here's how Abigail began her speech:

    "I am speaking on behalf of the United States of America because my negotiators cannot. The obstructionist Congress has shackled justice and delayed ambition for far too long. I am scared for my future. 2020 is too late to wait. We need an urgent path to a fair ambitious and legally binding treaty."

    After Abigail finished her speech, the entire plenary of nations ERUPTED in applause (except for, you know, the US). And as security escorted Abigail out, Democracy Now's Amy Goodman was on the spot with her microphone!

    Dec 9th – A young woman from Canada, Anjali Appadurai, shook the UN Assembly with one of the most beautiful, impassioned speeches we've ever heard—and followed it with the first ever human "mic check" on the UN stage. Anjali spoke eloquently and powerfully for her generation. It's a voice we'll be doing all we can to back up in the months and years ahead.

    When we posted Anjali's speech to Facebook, it quickly became the most popular update from the two week Durban summit—with over three thousand "Likes", "Shares", and comments. One veteran organizer commented, "I want to be like her when I grow up." Many commented that it brought them to tears. You can follow Anjali on Twitter here.




    Photos (Clockwise) by: Shayne Robinson, Shadia Fayne Wood, WWF International, Sarah Marchildon, and Ben Powless

    Dec 9th – In a culmination of two weeks of amazing people power—350 campaigners, hundreds of youth, and tons of allies pulled off something quite outrageous: we occupied the climate talks! It was about as beautiful, song-filled, chant-crazy, spirited, non-violent action as you could imagine. For two hours, we unleashed the people powered movement that we're building across the globe—and made sure your voices were heard.

    There is a story of hope from Durban—it's the story of the youth and their allies who refused to remain silent, and who will stand up everyday and everywhere and show the bravery we saw in South Africa. That's the progress we're most proud of. 

    Can you take a moment to share these stories of courage with all of your friends? Just click the buttons below...

                  http://350.org/this/is/courage+via+@350&source=clicktotweet" target="_blank">


    via 350.org

    • Tweet
  • Fishing in the desert

    • 8 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • aid drought fishing kenya oxfam pastorialists turkana
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Media_httpnewsbbcimgc_aszyu
    via bbc.co.uk

    Fishing in the desert. Great photos of a terrible situation -- how drought and hunger are forcing pastoralists to change their traditional way of life.

    • Tweet
  • Africa Renewal | Social media stimulates Nigerian debate on sexual violence

    • 7 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

     Share

    Home > Web Features
    6 December 2011

    Social media stimulates Nigerian debate on sexual violence

    By Yemisi Akinbobola

    In Nigeria, where a  majority of cases of sexual violence go unreported, social media has brought the issue into the openIn Nigeria, where a majority of cases of sexual violence go unreported, social media has brought the issue into the open.
    Photo: Africa Media Online / Eric Miller

    “Kill me, kill me, you people should just kill me.” Those were the words of an unidentified woman as she was being gang raped by five men and her ordeal was filmed with one of their mobile phones. The crime is believed to have taken place at a private off-campus hostel near Abia State University, Nigeria, in August 2011.

    The video of the rape, uploaded onto the Internet, caught the attention of blogger Linda Ikeji. Her subsequent blogpost of the crime sparked widespread anger and debate in Nigeria and beyond, especially among bloggers, Twitter users and organizations such as the youth group EnoughisEnough Nigeria.

    The authorities’ initially dismissive response to the rape video fuelled the outrage. Assistant Commissioner of Police J.G. Micloth released a statement that after watching the video, he had determined that the victim had not resisted, nor could the suspects be identified from the “legs shown in the video amongst 70 million males in Nigeria.”

    The only positive reaction by the authorities came from Minister of Youth Development Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, who described the rapists as “decadent and barbaric” and urged the authorities of Abia State University (ABSU) to investigate the crime.

    Abike Dabiri, a member of the House of Assembly and the only prominent female politician to speak out publicly against the rape, attempted to raise the issue in the legislature. But she was rebuked by another parliamentarian who accused her of dabbling “into cases the police can handle” and asked that she “take up the case personally and not bring it to public glare.”

    Human rights lawyer Caroline Ajie and other campaigners expressed their disappointment at the lack of response from the first lady “to issue a tacit statement and lead in condemning the dastardly act.” Ironically, the first lady is the founder of the Women for Change Initiative, which aims to raise women’s awareness of their human rights and promote issues that affect Nigerian women and girls.

    Unreported crime

    A majority of cases of sexual violence in Nigeria go unreported. This is due largely to fear on the part of the victim of being socially stigmatized or blamed. Ms. Ajie estimates that at least 2 million Nigerian girls experience sexual abuse annually and that only 28 per cent of rape cases are reported. Of those, only 12 per cent result in convictions.

    Elsie Reed, founder of Delta Women, an organization that aims to empower and fight for the rights of women in Delta State, estimates that 80 per cent of Nigerian women have experienced some form of sexual harassment.

    Marianne Møllmann, senior policy adviser at Amnesty International in London adds that violence against women, particularly sexual violence, is often viewed as normal or inevitable in many countries. “I’ve spoken to women whom I’ve asked if their husband is violent, and they say ‘yeah, he rapes me sometimes,’ as though it’s normal,” she says. “That shouldn’t be.”

    According to the UN Women campaign against gender-based violence, Africa Unite, anywhere between 13 per cent and 45 per cent of women in sub-Saharan Africa experience assault by an “intimate partner during their lifetime.”

    Africa Unite also reports that in Uganda, for example, an astonishing 59 per cent of women between the ages of 15 and 49 “have experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence in their lifetime.”

    Letty Chiwara, chief of the Africa Division of UN Women, explains that one of the key elements of the Africa Unite campaign is “to advocate or to make governments realize the need to have laws and policies that not only are about prevention, but are also about protecting and providing services to the victims.”

    Stirring online debate

    The existence of video evidence of the ABSU rape, as it as become popularly known, added to the outrage at the lack of an appropriate response by the Nigerian authorities.

    “Rape goes on in this country in universities everywhere,” argues blogger Joachim MacEbong. “Many are not reported, those that are reported are waved away. So if such a video [shows] there was clearly no consent, and we cannot do anything about it, it doesn’t make any sense.”

    Bloggers like Joachim have been at the forefront of the online debate regarding the ABSU rape. Popular Twitter users have also capitalized on their large following by releasing regular tweets to keep the debate alive.

    Henry Okelue, who lives in Nigeria and has more than 3,000 Twitter followers, sent out periodic tweets in his contribution to the campaign. “[I was] trying to get people to focus on the issue, trying to help people to form an opinion on what had happened,” he said. “Because the moment people stop talking about it, that’s the end of it.”

    ‘Rape walk’

    On 5 October, less than three weeks after Ms. Ikeji first blogged about the ABSU rape, the social media campaign moved offline as campaigners went on a ‘rape walk’ in Lagos and Abia. A similar walk was planned in Abuja, but had to be cancelled after authorities in the federal capital warned that the safety of the campaigners could not be guaranteed.

    In Lagos, only about 60 people were present at the march, suggesting perhaps that campaigners still have a long way to go in establishing physical social mobilization in their efforts to combat sexual violence against women.

    However, the use of virtual platforms to open up the debate is beginning to yield some positive results, according to Ms. Reed. “People now come forward, and people talk about it, and people are now aware that it’s not okay to sexually harass somebody.”

    Yet, despite the assertive social media campaign and the subsequent “rape walk,” no one has been charged in the ABSU rape.

    — Africa Renewal online

    Related stories

    • Congolese women confront legacy of rape
    • Security reform key to protecting women
    via un.org

    h/t @EdPomfret

    • Tweet
  • « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 29 30 Next »
  • About

    I post things here that strike a chord of joy. Or a nerve of anger. Or that I feel might interest someone else, and perhaps move them to help others. The buck stops with each of us. At the end of the day, we must fight for justice together.

    28797 Views
  • Archive

    • 2012 (7)
      • April (1)
      • February (6)
    • 2011 (108)
      • December (4)
      • November (1)
      • October (2)
      • September (7)
      • August (10)
      • July (8)
      • June (3)
      • May (6)
      • April (12)
      • March (16)
      • February (18)
      • January (21)
    • 2010 (181)
      • December (11)
      • November (22)
      • October (27)
      • September (19)
      • August (28)
      • July (17)
      • June (29)
      • May (16)
      • April (6)
      • January (6)

    Get Updates

    Subscribe via RSS
    Twitter